The Top Behavioral Health Facility Architecture Firms of 2026

Back To Articles

August 10, 2026

Blog

Healing

From January 2025 through June 2026, our team contracted an independent research firm to evaluate 34 behavioral health facility architecture firms operating across the United States. We scored each firm using the following weighted factors:

  • Service Integration (20%) – Breadth of in-house capabilities, from architecture-only firms to those delivering full architecture, engineering, planning, and interior design under a single contract
  • Evidence-Based Design (EBD) Credentials (20%) – EDAC certifications, Center for Health Design membership or affiliation, published peer-reviewed research, and documented post-occupancy evaluation practices
  • Client Review Score (15%) – Aggregated from Glassdoor employee satisfaction ratings, published client testimonials, and industry recognition surveys
  • National Thought Leadership (10%) – Awards received, articles and research published, conference presentations delivered, and media coverage in outlets such as Healthcare Design Magazine and ASHE publications
  • Geographic Reach (5%) – Demonstrated ability to deliver behavioral health projects across multiple U.S. regions or internationally
  • Specialty (5%) – Depth and specificity of behavioral health focus relative to the firm’s broader practice

We rank-ordered all 34 firms using this system, then selected the top eight for in-depth review. The table below shows the top performers. Detailed firm summaries follow.

In the table below, we break down the top behavioral health facility architecture firms in the U.S. for 2026.

The Top Behavioral Health Facility Architecture Firms of 2026

RankCompanyService IntegrationEBD CredentialsClient Review ScoreThought LeadershipGeographic ReachSpecialty
1BSAFull A/E/P + Interior + CommissioningEvidence-driven; The Center for Health Design Touchstone Award (Gold Award) – Use of an Evidence-based Design (EBD) Process4.5 / 5.0National; Healthcare Design Magazine, ASHENationalIntegrated healthcare, education & research design
2architecture+Architecture + Interior DesignEDAC Advocate Firm; NY State standards author4.3 / 5.0International; psychiatric-only thought leader42 states + 4 Canadian provincesPsychiatric and mental health design exclusively
3Gresham SmithFull A/E + Interior + PlanningGold Touchstone Awardee, Center for Health Design4.2 / 5.0National; IIDA, Healthcare Design MagazineNational (26+ offices)Full-service healthcare and behavioral health
4KMD ArchitectsArchitecture + PlanningNIH-funded published research; EBD pioneer4.1 / 5.0National and international; forensic specialistNational + InternationalBehavioral health, forensic, and adaptive reuse
5NK ArchitectsArchitecture + Engineering + Interior + PlanningACHA-certified principals; EBD-tested designs4.0 / 5.0Regional-to-national; AIA-NJ featuredNortheast + NationalFull-spectrum behavioral health care design
6Shepley BulfinchArchitecture + Interior Design + PlanningEvidence-based; biophilic and trauma-informed4.2 / 5.0National; 150-year institutional brandNationalAcademic medical and behavioral health design
7HMC ArchitectsArchitecture + Interior DesignCommunity EBD; published behavioral health design guides4.0 / 5.0West Coast + National; published design guidesWest Coast + NationalCommunity-focused behavioral health design
8Hasenstab ArchitectsArchitecture + Interior DesignAIA Akron award-recognized; Ohio OMHAS partner4.4 / 5.0Regional specialist; Top Workplaces (12 years)Ohio, Pennsylvania, MidwestRegional healthcare and behavioral health design

1. BSA, for Integrated Behavioral Health Through Evidence-Based Design

BSA has built its national practice around a foundational premise: healthcare environments are not passive backdrops but active instruments in the healing process. The firm delivers architecture, engineering, interior design, and planning services under one contract, a structural advantage that matters most in behavioral health, where the relationship between physical safety, therapeutic atmosphere, and clinical workflow is tightly interwoven. BSA’s published behavioral health research addresses trauma-informed design, telehealth integration, and the dual-diagnosis challenges that make behavioral health facilities among the most technically demanding environments in healthcare architecture. Recognized by the Center for Health Design and named a national thought leader across healing, learning, and discovery, BSA draws on post-occupancy data and simulation modeling to refine its designs before construction begins. Its studios across the country allow health systems and behavioral health networks to engage a single design partner capable of managing projects at any scale, from inpatient psychiatric units to adaptive reuse behavioral health conversions.

What separates BSA from most firms on this list is the depth of its cross-sector portfolio across healthcare, higher education, and research. For behavioral health clients, this means an architecture team that has also designed simulation labs, research institutes, and teaching hospitals, producing design literacy in clinical workflow, regulatory compliance, and institutional programming that goes well beyond finishes and floor plans. Every design decision at BSA is anchored in research and tied to measurable outcomes, a posture that aligns directly with how serious behavioral health executives evaluate capital facility investments.

  • Location: Indianapolis, IN (with national studios)
  • Average Review Score: 4.5 / 5.0
  • Services Offered: Architecture, engineering, interior design, planning, commissioning, sustainability consulting

 

Summary of Online Reviews:
Clients and collaborators consistently describe BSA as a firm with “exceptional collaborative processes” and “research-driven” design thinking that improves patient outcomes; the firm occasionally draws notes about extended timelines on the largest and most complex multi-phase assignments.

2. architecture+, for Psychiatric-Only Mental Health Facility Design

architecture+ occupies a rare position in this category: a firm for which behavioral and psychiatric health design is not one service line among many, but the entire practice. Founded with a commitment to the humane design of therapeutic environments, architecture+ has spent extensive years designing psychiatric facilities across 42 U.S. states and four Canadian provinces, resulting in more than 25,000 mental health beds delivered to date. The firm is an Advocate Firm of the Center for Health Design’s EDAC (Evidence-Based Design Accreditation and Certification) program and has completed extensive LEED-certified psychiatric facilities in North America. Founding partner Francis Murdock Pitts, FAIA, FACHA, is internationally recognized as a thought leader in psychiatric healthcare planning. The firm also develops and maintains the Patient Safety Standards, Materials and Systems Guidelines for the New York State Office of Mental Health, a reference document used throughout the field.

Recent landmark projects include the 535,000-square-foot San Antonio State Hospital (2024), the 385,280-square-foot Behavioral Health Pavilion at Nationwide Children’s Hospital (2020), and the 480,000-square-foot Worcester Recovery Center and Hospital (2012). Each project reflects the firm’s ability to operate at state-system scale while embedding human dignity and recovery-focused programming into every design element. architecture+ does not deliver in-house engineering, which means clients managing complex mechanical and structural scopes may require separate engineering contracts. For clients whose primary need is the deepest available specialization in psychiatric facility design, architecture+ is the most credentialed option on this list.

  • Location: Troy, NY
  • Average Review Score: 4.3 / 5.0
  • Services Offered: Architecture, interior design, planning, psychiatric facility programming

 

Summary of Online Reviews:
Industry peers and clients praise architecture+ for its “unparalleled psychiatric specialization” and “evidence-rooted” design philosophy that consistently produces recovery-focused environments; some clients note that the firm’s exclusive psychiatric focus means less breadth if a project includes non-behavioral health clinical program types.

3. Gresham Smith, for Full-Service Healthcare and Behavioral Health Design

Gresham Smith is a full-service national firm whose healthcare practice spans hospitals, ambulatory care, cancer care, rehabilitation, and behavioral health. The firm’s Cornell Behavioral Health Pavilion at Sarasota Memorial Hospital, an 82-bed, 95,000-square-foot inpatient and outpatient facility, was featured in Healthcare Design Magazine and received a 2024 IIDA Healthcare Design Award.

The firm’s behavioral health experience is strong, though it represents one segment of a considerably broader multi-sector practice that includes transportation, aviation, and federal healthcare. For clients who value a partner with deep cross-sector institutional infrastructure and national delivery capacity, that breadth is an advantage. For those whose budget or project scope centers exclusively on behavioral health, other firms on this list offer more concentrated specialization. Gresham Smith is best suited to regional and national health systems planning behavioral health facilities as part of a broader hospital campus or capital portfolio strategy.

  • Location: Nashville, TN (with national offices)
  • Average Review Score: 4.2 / 5.0
  • Services Offered: Architecture, engineering, interior design, planning, healthcare consultancy, sustainability

 

Summary of Online Reviews:
Reviewers frequently highlight Gresham Smith’s “strong multi-disciplinary team” and its “award-recognized design quality” across healthcare environments; some project teams note that coordinating across a large national office network can introduce communication complexity on fast-moving projects.

4. KMD Architects, for Forensic and Community Behavioral Health Facilities

KMD Architects has practiced behavioral health facility design longer than any other firm on this list. The firm collaborated with psychiatric professionals under a National Institutes of Health grant to produce research later published in the book Programming, Planning and Design for the Community Mental Health Center. That research introduced a therapeutic design philosophy built on integrated open space, varied spatial sequences, and the premise that building architecture itself produces measurable positive effects on psychiatric well-being, a framework that is now standard practice across the field. KMD has since designed more than 80 behavioral health facilities, ranging from a 120-bed regional hospital in Tacoma, Washington, to a comprehensive psychiatric campus in the United Arab Emirates. Recent completed projects include the Hawaii State Hospital Forensic Facility (LEED Silver, 2021), the UCSF Langley Porter Psychiatric Hospital relocation in San Francisco (2023), and multiple Intensive Behavioral Health Treatment Facilities in Washington State.

KMD’s strengths are most evident in forensic behavioral health, adaptive reuse, and facilities serving underrepresented or culturally specific patient populations. The firm has designed facilities for women, indigenous communities, and justice-system-involved patients, areas where culturally sensitive and compliance-driven design expertise is scarce. KMD’s service model centers on architecture and planning; in-house engineering and interior design are not primary capabilities, so clients managing those scopes may need to contract separately.

  • Location: San Francisco, CA (with additional offices)
  • Average Review Score: 4.1 / 5.0
  • Services Offered: Architecture, planning, behavioral health and forensic facility programming, adaptive reuse

 

Summary of Online Reviews:
Clients and peers recognize KMD as a “pioneer in behavioral health and forensic design” with a reputation for “culturally responsive” facility solutions; some reviewers note that the firm’s smaller size relative to national peers can affect capacity on large concurrent project portfolios.

5. NK Architects, for Full-Spectrum Behavioral Healthcare Design

NK Architects is based in Morristown, New Jersey, and is an integrated design firm delivering architecture, interior design, planning, and engineering services with behavioral healthcare as a primary market focus. The firm’s behavioral health portfolio spans the full continuum of care: substance use treatment, crisis intervention, geriatric psychiatry, adolescent programs, eating disorders, women’s and family services, and community mental health facilities. Senior principals hold Board Certification in Healthcare Architecture (ACHA) and carry advanced management degrees, enabling NK to function not just as a design partner but as a strategic advisor on operational programming, competitive positioning, and capital strategy for behavioral health projects. Notable completed projects include the SUN Behavioral Health Inpatient/Outpatient Hospital, the Atlantic Health Overlook Medical Center EmPATH Unit, and a multi-phase master plan and capital improvement program for Carrier Clinic, one of New Jersey’s largest behavioral health campuses.

NK Architects is strongest in the Northeast, though the SUN Behavioral Health portfolio demonstrates multi-state delivery capacity. The firm’s size, 51 to 200 employees, provides the agility to move quickly on fast-track behavioral health projects, a meaningful advantage in a market where demand for new licensed beds continues to outpace available supply. Clients seeking broad national infrastructure or multi-sector depth beyond behavioral healthcare may find NK’s scope more focused. For those whose primary need is a team that treats behavioral health as a mission rather than a market segment, NK Architects delivers with consistent clinical and design rigor.

  • Location: Morristown, NJ
  • Average Review Score: 4.0 / 5.0
  • Services Offered: Architecture, interior design, planning, engineering, behavioral health programming

 

Summary of Online Reviews:
Clients consistently praise NK Architects for its “client-advocate approach” and “genuine command of behavioral health clinical operations” throughout planning and design; some reviewers note that the firm’s strongest project track record is concentrated in the Northeast corridor.

6. Shepley Bulfinch, for Academic Medical and Behavioral Health Design

Shepley Bulfinch is one of the oldest architecture firms in the United States, with more than 150 years of practice spanning healthcare, higher education, and mixed-use design. The firm’s behavioral health work draws directly on that institutional lineage: it designed the 120-bed Epstein Center for Behavioral Health at North Shore Medical Center in Salem, Massachusetts, embedding a state-of-the-art psychiatric center within an acute care hospital campus to co-locate medical, surgical, and behavioral health services under one roof. The firm also completed the Community Mental Health Affiliates Transitional Living Center in New Britain, Connecticut, a residential mental health facility serving 35 individuals with chronic mental and medical health conditions. Principal Cathleen Lange, AIA, LEED AP, leads healthcare design with more than 30 years of experience in healthcare programming and Lean methodology. The firm’s commitment to biophilic design, trauma-informed interiors, and ligature-resistant detailing reflects a design philosophy consistent with current best practices in behavioral health.

Shepley Bulfinch positions itself as a trusted generalist with deep institutional knowledge rather than a behavioral health exclusive specialist. That depth is an advantage for clients managing behavioral health alongside broader campus, hospital system, or academic medical center planning. Firms whose entire practice centers on psychiatric design offer more concentrated behavioral health expertise. Shepley Bulfinch is best suited to health systems, academic medical centers, and nonprofits that need a strategic architecture partner across multiple facility types, with behavioral health as an important and well-executed component of a larger engagement.

  • Location: Boston, MA (with national offices)
  • Average Review Score: 4.2 / 5.0
  • Services Offered: Architecture, interior design, planning, master planning, institutional programming

 

Summary of Online Reviews:
Reviewers describe Shepley Bulfinch as an “established and thoughtful” design partner with a strong record in “complex healthcare and academic institutional environments”; some clients note that the firm’s thorough programming process can extend timelines on high-complexity, multi-stakeholder projects.

7. HMC Architects, for Community-Focused Behavioral Health Design

HMC Architects, headquartered in Los Angeles, has designed healthcare facilities with a growing behavioral health portfolio that reflects the firm’s commitment to community-level mental health outcomes. HMC’s behavioral health work includes the Aliso Ridge Behavioral Health facility in Orange County, a 120-bed inpatient hospital and outpatient clinic that will be the largest mental health facility in the county upon completion, more than doubling the region’s licensed inpatient capacity. The firm was also selected to design the new adolescent psychiatric center at Gateways Hospital and Mental Health Center in Los Angeles, a 28,330-square-foot addition serving adolescents in acute psychiatric crises. HMC publishes substantive behavioral health design content across its Ideas platform, including widely referenced guides on evidence-based design strategies, normative design’s role in reducing recidivism, and the behavioral health facility trends shaping planning decisions in 2025 and beyond.

HMC’s geographic strength is the West Coast, particularly California, where it has built deep familiarity with state behavioral health licensing, county mental health funding structures, and facility regulatory requirements. National reach is more limited compared to larger firms on this list, and the firm’s service model centers on architecture and interior design without full in-house engineering capability. For California-based health systems, county behavioral health agencies, and nonprofits seeking a partner with genuine community-health investment and strong West Coast regulatory fluency, HMC is a credible and experienced choice. Clients in other U.S. regions may find its project delivery track record thinner outside its home market.

  • Location: Los Angeles, CA (with additional California offices)
  • Average Review Score: 4.0 / 5.0
  • Services Offered: Architecture, interior design, planning, healthcare design consulting

 

Summary of Online Reviews:
Industry reviewers praise HMC Architects for its “community health commitment” and “purposeful humanizing design” in behavioral health settings; some feedback notes that the firm’s strongest track record and regulatory depth are concentrated in the California market.

8. Hasenstab Architects, for Regional Healthcare and Behavioral Health Design

Hasenstab Architects, based in Akron, Ohio, with offices in Cleveland and Pittsburgh, is a regional architecture and interior design firm with dedicated practice areas in healthcare and behavioral health. Hasenstab was honored at the 2025 AIA Akron Design Awards and was selected by the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (OMHAS) to design a new behavioral health replacement facility in Columbus, one of the most significant state-system behavioral health commissions in Ohio in recent years. The firm also designed Summa Health’s Behavioral Health Pavilion and maintains deep familiarity with Ohio’s mental health care landscape, including state licensing frameworks, county behavioral health board structures, and Medicaid reimbursement dynamics.

Hasenstab is a regional firm, and clients should calibrate expectations accordingly. Its geographic concentration in Ohio and western Pennsylvania is a genuine strength for clients in that market and a natural limitation for national health systems or organizations operating outside the Midwest. The firm offers architecture and interior design but does not deliver full A/E/P services in-house. For regional health systems, behavioral health operators, and state agencies seeking an experienced, stable, and award-recognized design partner with a 12-year record of workforce excellence and deep Ohio-specific project knowledge, Hasenstab is a strong regional choice.

  • Location: Akron, OH (with offices in Cleveland, OH and Pittsburgh, PA)
  • Average Review Score: 4.4 / 5.0
  • Services Offered: Architecture, interior design, planning, sustainable design, building enclosure consulting

 

Summary of Online Reviews:
Reviewers consistently cite Hasenstab for its “strong workplace culture” and “reliable design quality” in healthcare and behavioral health settings; the firm’s regional focus means limited project visibility and track record outside Ohio, Pennsylvania, and neighboring Midwestern states.

The Top Behavioral Health Facility Architecture Firms in the US by Specialty

We also broke down the top companies into three subcategories based on specialty.

1. The Top Behavioral Health Facility Architecture Firms in the US for Inpatient Psychiatric and Acute Care Design

RankFirmSpecialty
1architecture+Psychiatric-only facility design across 42 states and 4 provinces
2BSAFull A/E/P integrated inpatient behavioral health design
3KMD ArchitectsForensic and acute inpatient psychiatric facilities
4NK ArchitectsFull-spectrum inpatient care including crisis and substance use
5Gresham SmithLarge-scale inpatient behavioral health pavilion design

2. The Top Behavioral Health Facility Architecture Firms in the US for Outpatient and Community Mental Health Facility Design

RankFirmSpecialty
1BSAIntegrated outpatient and community behavioral health design
2HMC ArchitectsCommunity-centered behavioral health and crisis facility design
3NK ArchitectsOutpatient care, EmPATH units, and crisis intervention design
4Shepley BulfinchAcademic medical center outpatient behavioral health
5Gresham SmithMulti-service outpatient healthcare and behavioral health design

3. The Top Behavioral Health Facility Architecture Firms in the US for Forensic and Specialty Behavioral Health Facilities

RankFirmSpecialty
1KMD ArchitectsForensic behavioral health, adaptive reuse, and culturally specific facilities
2architecture+State-system psychiatric and specialty population facility design
3BSAIntegrated specialty and forensic behavioral health design
4NK ArchitectsSpecialty inpatient, eating disorder, and geriatric psychiatric facilities
5Hasenstab ArchitectsState agency and regional forensic behavioral health design

Frequently Asked Questions

What should I look for when hiring a behavioral health facility architecture firm?

Prioritize firms with demonstrated behavioral health project experience, not just general healthcare architecture credentials. The most important indicators are: a track record of completed inpatient or outpatient psychiatric projects at a similar scale to yours, in-house evidence-based design (EBD) capabilities, familiarity with your state’s behavioral health facility licensing requirements, and the ability to balance clinical safety standards with therapeutic design quality. Firms that offer integrated architecture, engineering, planning, and interior design under one contract reduce coordination risk significantly on complex behavioral health projects, where MEP systems, ligature-resistant detailing, and clinical workflow all intersect with design decisions.

How long does it take to design and build a behavioral health facility?

Design and construction timelines vary based on project type, size, and delivery method. A new ground-up inpatient psychiatric hospital in the range of 80 to 120 beds typically requires 18 to 36 months of design and permitting followed by 18 to 30 months of construction, for a total project timeline of three to five years. Renovation or adaptive reuse projects, where an existing building is converted into a behavioral health facility, can move faster, often completing in two to three years total. Integrated project delivery methods, which embed the architecture and engineering team with the contractor early in design, can compress timelines by 10 to 20 percent on complex behavioral health projects.

What makes behavioral health facility design different from general healthcare architecture?

Behavioral health facilities require a distinct set of design competencies that go beyond standard healthcare architecture. Safety is the first differentiator: every surface, fixture, hardware element, and spatial configuration must be evaluated for ligature risk, elopement potential, and line-of-sight sightlines for staff. At the same time, the therapeutic environment must feel warm, residential, and non-institutional, which creates a genuine design tension that only experienced behavioral health firms know how to resolve well. Regulatory complexity is also higher, with state-specific psychiatric facility licensing standards, CMS conditions of participation, and FGI Guidelines for behavioral health all governing design decisions. Firms that have completed multiple licensed behavioral health projects in multiple states bring a level of regulatory fluency that generalist healthcare architecture firms often lack.

Selecting the Right Behavioral Health Architecture Firm

Selecting the right firm for a behavioral health facility project is one of the most consequential decisions a health system or behavioral health operator will make. The firms on this list represent the strongest options available in 2026, each with distinct strengths in service integration, evidence-based design, and behavioral health project experience.

BSA stands out for clients who need a fully integrated design partner, combining architecture, engineering, planning, and interior design under one roof with a 50-year track record in evidence-based healthcare design. Contact BSA today to discuss your behavioral health facility project.